| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Should we bring back Mystics as a coterie? |
| yes |
|
58% |
[ 7 ] |
| no |
|
41% |
[ 5 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 12 |
|
| Author |
Message |
Baer
 
Joined: 22 Jan 2004
Posts: 618
Location: Michigan
|
 Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 2:42 am Post subject: Mystics as a coterie? |
|
|
I think the poll will speak for itself, but I'll ask it here as well...
How many of my fellow mudders are in favour of bringing Mystics back as a coterie? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Quiet Wanderer
Joined: 16 Feb 2004
Posts: 547
Location: Western Michigan
|
| Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 2:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I voted no simply because of this: The Old Mystices had no purporse, so what purpose would they have. They would have to be modified to be brought back. As we've seen, people are dropping from Cabals left and right because of not enough time needed, and higher ranked members in a Cabal are spread far too thin, far too often. why stretch them more? Could you maybe explain how you want them brought back? What would they do? etc.. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Davor
Joined: 16 Jan 2004
Posts: 229
Location: Seeogra
|
| Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 6:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Coteries are roleplay oriented groups with no particular skills or features that require them to be formed by immortals. If you guys wish mystics in... well form them.
Spam some spells, create a meaningful concept for a coterie, and establish it, with persistent effort you'll have a firm, healthy organisation. That is about the way I'd like to see coteries formed from now on. Player incentive.
Hence I voted no, for this poll I comprehend as appeal for immortal staff to hand you over something you can do yourself. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Erlwith
Joined: 22 Mar 2006
Posts: 1626
|
| Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 7:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Coteries are roleplay oriented groups with no particular skills or features that require them to be formed by immortals. If you guys wish mystics in... well form them.
Spam some spells, create a meaningful concept for a coterie, and establish it, with persistent effort you'll have a firm, healthy organisation. That is about the way I'd like to see coteries formed from now on. Player incentive.
Hence I voted no, for this poll I comprehend as appeal for immortal staff to hand you over something you can do yourself. |
Uhm... what? These dimwit clans that have two people in it that shout crazy stuff and put SILVER SPIDER in their description does not a "clan" make.
I'm all for Mystics, I just think there's a need for a bigger player base before any new organizations are brought in, personally. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kedaleam
Immortal
Joined: 25 Mar 2006
Posts: 989
Location: Michigan
|
| Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 8:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Should Mystics be brought back? Sure... Maybe... But as a coterie? I dont really think so. That doesnt necessarily mean they cant PK but I do remember the Mystics of old to be quite the PKers... Anyone remember Ug? And... I do think they would definately need more of a purpose if they were brought back, in my opinion... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
theobserver
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue May 09, 2006 9:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Rayor wrote: |
| Should Mystics be brought back? Sure... Maybe... But as a coterie? I dont really think so. That doesnt necessarily mean they cant PK but I do remember the Mystics of old to be quite the PKers... Anyone remember Ug? And... I do think they would definately need more of a purpose if they were brought back, in my opinion... |
That was part of the reason why they were scrapped. People such as Ug turning them into another version of the Legion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ 
Search 
Memberlist 
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in 
