View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
The Reaper
Joined: 24 Jul 2005 Posts: 3826
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 12:08 am Post subject: Playerkilling Statistics for May 2011 |
|
|
[KNIGHT]
Adin: kills 1, deaths 2
Taelrask: kills 2, deaths 4
Yimbari: kills 0, deaths 1
Aduron: kills 0, deaths 2
TOTAL: kills 3, deaths 9 (efficiency 25%)
[LEGION]
Ygin: kills 10, deaths 0
Norstith: kills 5, deaths 3
Schist: kills 4, deaths 4
Oceralin: kills 5, deaths 2
TOTAL: kills 24, deaths 9 (efficiency 72%)
[JUSTICE]
Worrokk: kills 14, deaths 6
Dhua: kills 2, deaths 1
Chibren: kills 1, deaths 9
TOTAL: kills 17, deaths 16 (efficiency 51%)
[KEEPER]
Mthakik: kills 4, deaths 1
TOTAL: kills 4, deaths 1 (efficiency 80%)
[UNCABALLED] (level 50 kills only)
Lorelle: kills 5, deaths 0
Aviscus: kills 2, deaths 1
Grunchel: kills 1, deaths 1
Faion: kills 1, deaths 0
Galurn: kills 1, deaths 1
Vielkorik: kills 1, deaths 2
Igiag: kills 0, deaths 6
Kariam: kills 0, deaths 2
Stilson: kills 0, deaths 3
Zaraxl: kills 0, deaths 3
[WORST MATCHUPS]
Stilson vs Zaraxl 3- 0
Ygin vs Chibren 3- 0
Kronk vs Provicus 2- 0
Zaraxl vs Igiag 2- 0
Worrokk vs Norstith 2- 0
[MOST LETHAL] (level 50 kills only)
Worrokk: kills 9, deaths 6
Ygin: kills 9, deaths 0
Lorelle: kills 5, deaths 0
Norstith: kills 5, deaths 3
Schist: kills 4, deaths 4
[MOST ABUSED]
Uzume: kills 0, deaths 15
Provicus: kills 0, deaths 10
Keppli: kills 0, deaths 9
Chibren: kills 1, deaths 9
Saeka: kills 1, deaths 6
70 pkers have scored a bodycount of 174.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
tayyah
Joined: 20 May 2011 Posts: 597
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 4:20 pm Post subject: is it just me |
|
|
Or does there seem to be some mistakes here? Like two of the top rated killers have 0 kills, or that the last 4 people in the top uncaballed level 50's are actually level 40 or lower |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Voltron
Joined: 14 Sep 2010 Posts: 191
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 6:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What two top rated killers have 0 kills? You're wrong... ?
As for the 4 unpinnacleds on the uncaballed list idk about that. I can't imagine all those deaths can be attributed to 50s cause they shouldn't be in range. And they didn't even get any kills. So I'm guessing there aren't enough 50's to fill up the slots. So it just grabbed whoever was next? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
tayyah
Joined: 20 May 2011 Posts: 597
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:08 pm Post subject: hmm |
|
|
I am refering to the main list on the header of all the forum, Current Top Five Rated Killers, 4. Igiag the Mistress of Wildlife, 5. Stilson the Master of the Arcane. Both are lvl 40, and both according to the pk stats, have 0 kills |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Voltron
Joined: 14 Sep 2010 Posts: 191
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 7:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Oh. That list on top of the forum is rating, not record. And that list is according to right now, the pk stats are for May. So.. the rating is affected from every kill and death you've had since 36. Regardless of what month it was in. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olyn Immortal
Joined: 23 Jul 2008 Posts: 3249 Location: Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Wed Jun 01, 2011 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That list pulls the top 5 from the players page, so think of it as the top rated killers who have enough minutes played so far this month. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mummy
Joined: 11 Sep 2006 Posts: 698 Location: Under Resatimm's Ass
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 4:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
This thing is inaccurate, though. I saw Stilson, Zaraxl, Igiag, Provicus, etc. kill people. They also are all (except maybe Provicus) not in range of 50's... <.< |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Voltron
Joined: 14 Sep 2010 Posts: 191
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 4:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's why it says 0 kills Mummy. That list only counts kills of level 50's. Frequently you'll see someone listed above with 6 kills and then on that list with 4. Meaning 2 kills were of lower leveld chars. So obviously those guys didn't kill any 50s. So 0 kills. The question is why they're even on the list at all. Which really isn't a very important question. I'm sure we could figure out more consequential questions to ask, if we really tried. lol |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mummy
Joined: 11 Sep 2006 Posts: 698 Location: Under Resatimm's Ass
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Ooooooh. My bad. Thanks for that. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vevier Immortal
Joined: 23 Jul 2008 Posts: 1642 Location: everywhere
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:42 am Post subject: |
|
|
As far as I can tell (and far be it from me to be the voice of authority here, I'm guessing as much as everyone else) it might be because they had kills that were reduced by penalty? So having the kills puts them on the list, but it shows as zero since that was their net. *shrug* |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Olyn Immortal
Joined: 23 Jul 2008 Posts: 3249 Location: Pennsylvania
|
Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 2:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'd say the list sorts by lvl 50s killed, with total kills as a tie-breaker. Those characters listed with 0 kills haven't killed any level 50s, but had more non-50 kills than everyone else. Just my guess. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|