Treant fire weakness and spirit bond

[Davairus]

Ivindel I'm officially tired of replying over and over that the treant vuln doesn't get totally negated by fire bond. It is not true and you are spreading misinformation. What could be pointed out instead is that vulns are not all equal and the treant vuln (and gnome vuln) are not on the same tier as dwarf vs water. What that means is that its going to be important to find an actual good fire damage weapon instead of trying to pwn a level 50 treant druid with a fucking fiery dagger. This would be inadequate without the fire bond. I can't think of any good reason why you think that is going to work. Like at least witch carve something first if you don't want to get a deadly whip of fire or whatever the flail tha does fire damage is.

[turningpoint]

You must be right about it being fire spirit bond. I just looked at the first bond that said fire resistance and didn't realize that two different bonds provide fire resistance, which makes sense that fire bond would also provide fire resistance..

I'm still trying to retain the information between spirit bonds and monk styles, so this has been great for educational purposes. Thanks.

[Mogu]

Add chop/cleave vuln for treants. Nobody will complain about fire vuln. I realize this suggestion isn't well thought out (mages/clerics couldn't really exploit that vuln) but it does make sense to me thematically.

[lionSpyre]

I dunno man… flesh is a hell of a lot easier to cleave than wood is.

[Davairus]

Maybe dark-knights can channel hatred into their weapons so they can build a cursed weapon that's exceptionally strong vs treants. Then we can just merge these two threads.

[Mogu]

Hahaha dark-knights hate trees and hippies.

[Stiehl26]

Time to start tracking rares/uniques. Twerp is on the case.