| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Davairus
Implementor
Joined: 16 Jan 2004
Posts: 10351
Location: 0x0000
|
 Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 5:02 am Post subject: Playerkilling Statistics for October 2005 |
|
|
[KNIGHT]
Jermayn 3-6
Kelek 4-7
Navatar 1-1
Prastin 0-2
Totals = 8-16
[LEGION]
(Dharza) 19-9
(Orkahn) 1-2
Rolf 45-10
Thkot 8-3
Vandrez 12-4
Totals = 85-28
[JUSTICE]
(Arahtuff) 1-4
Cramen 1-3
Grimp 6-3
Thremus 3-1
Vakarath 1-0
Xalos 3-2
Totals = 15-13
[WARLORD]
(Avoro) 1-7
Chlor 11-4
Ellar 3-8
Giune 18-16
Graxxus 4-1
(Grevon) 3-5
Latamire 5-4
(Lahbras) 9-15
(Nassi) 9-11
Nychlas 8-4
Totals = 71-75
Honorable mentions
Cloise 7-19
Jonus 6-5
Roherad 10-0
Txivnezjwo 28-5
Veeraza 21-13
Top ten killers
1) Rolf 45-10
2) Txivnezjwo 28-5
3) Veeraza 21-13
4) Giune 18-16
5) (Dharza) 19-9
6) Vandrez 12-4
7) Chlor 11-4
8) Roherad 10-0
9) (Nassi) 9-11
10) (Lahbras) 9-15
Most abused
1) Cloise 7-19
2) Giune 18-16
3) (Lahbras) 9-15
4) Veeraza 21-13
5) Myiisla 3-12
6) (Nassi) 9-11
7) Thalozar 0-10
8) Rolf 45-10
9) Dharza 19-9
10) Ellar 3-8
Worst matchups... wait for Resatimm to post it
Last edited by Davairus on Mon Feb 12, 2007 3:24 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Davor
Joined: 16 Jan 2004
Posts: 229
Location: Seeogra
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 10:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
Finally good run for legion, gg guys.
Massive respect to Rolf for this months run.
Congrats to all who made the lists. Keep up the good work. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marsd
Joined: 16 Jan 2004
Posts: 832
Location: Magewares
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
(Grevon) 3-5
Yahoo~ I'd say an improvement compared that with Anarenth  lol. But fuck, he got booted faster than Anarenth got the shaft. Sigh enough warlords for a year.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Altheripper
Joined: 20 Oct 2004
Posts: 326
Location: Vancouver, WA
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 3:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wow..... Rolf = total pwnage |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Simpleton
Joined: 22 Jan 2004
Posts: 150
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 4:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Wow, what a difference a month makes. Knights last month 45-13, this month 8-16. I thought that they were doing fine too. Dam Rolf you that man. Who all killed ya if you don't mind me asking? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kelek
Guest
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yeah, so sad half of Knights kills were mine... Then again half the deaths were mine too. Some of them were stupid too.
1- Nyemes
1- Myiisla
1- Txivnezjwo
1- Dharza
3- Rolf (fair combat)
1- Rolf (while requesting...) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Neonin
Joined: 21 Jan 2004
Posts: 67
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 07, 2005 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Damn I should start playing again... I'd totally own the "Most Abused" table  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Vandrez
Joined: 04 Nov 2005
Posts: 92
Location: SexyStilo
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 4:01 am Post subject: Wow |
|
|
| I actually made top 10 lol Thats cool I made 6th haha... I feel good about my self. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Davairus
Implementor
Joined: 16 Jan 2004
Posts: 10351
Location: 0x0000
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 4:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Most abused is always my favorite table to put together. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Jermayn
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 11:53 am Post subject: bleh |
|
|
| well, tack on two or three of my deaths to pure frustration against Rolf, I have the hardest time trying to figure out how to beat him...hell, it's forced me to take a short hiatus so I can enjoy the game again, and not /rage delete. When you're always losing, it's hard not to get discouraged. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marsd
Joined: 16 Jan 2004
Posts: 832
Location: Magewares
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 1:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Well, get more knights on together. Who said you had to go 1v1 against another cabal? Besides.... 90% of the time I'm on, I see no caballed.... cough. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Rolf
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| marsd wrote: |
| Well, get more knights on together. Who said you had to go 1v1 against another cabal? |
Yes, let's encourage *more* ooc gangbanging across cabals. CABAL RULES say that you have to go 1v1 (unless you're defending your cabal, among other special circumstances). |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Rolf wrote: |
| marsd wrote: |
| Well, get more knights on together. Who said you had to go 1v1 against another cabal? |
Yes, let's encourage *more* ooc gangbanging across cabals. CABAL RULES say that you have to go 1v1 (unless you're defending your cabal, among other special circumstances). |
Right or wrong, your quickness to attack that suggestion sounds like you're afraid of it happening. Cabals or otherwise, 2v1 and even 3v1 battles happen all the time.
You're usually expected as a caballed 50 to at least be able to stand your ground against a 2v1... not necessarily to BEAT both of them, but usually to run around for a while and give 'em a good run for their money. It's the nature of the beast, and unfortunately when you're on top (40+ kills and ~10 deaths) people realize that the 1v1 idea just isn't a good one.
Good luck.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marsd
Joined: 16 Jan 2004
Posts: 832
Location: Magewares
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 2:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mmm, but don't legion have that perfect skill to "fix" a gangbang? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
Right or wrong, your quickness to attack that suggestion sounds like you're afraid of it happening. Cabals or otherwise, 2v1 and even 3v1 battles happen all the time.
You're usually expected as a caballed 50 to at least be able to stand your ground against a 2v1... not necessarily to BEAT both of them, but usually to run around for a while and give 'em a good run for their money. It's the nature of the beast, and unfortunately when you're on top (40+ kills and ~10 deaths) people realize that the 1v1 idea just isn't a good one.
Good luck. |
Ah, yes, because I should really welcome people breaking both cabal and game rules and hopping on to 3 on 1 gangbang me blatantly ooc, which does happen. I don't mind fighting against the odds or against groups, but not when they are cheating.
| Quote: |
| Mmm, but don't legion have that perfect skill to "fix" a gangbang? |
Only works on contracted people. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Sebryn
Joined: 16 Jan 2004
Posts: 1185
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2005 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: |
| Ah, yes, because I should really welcome people breaking both cabal and game rules and hopping on to 3 on 1 gangbang me blatantly ooc, which does happen. I don't mind fighting against the odds or against groups, but not when they are cheating. |
You're making the assumption that EVERY group of 2 or 3 people was assembled through ooc means. So does that mean that each time we see someone group together with someone else, we should bust them?
I'm not saying that ooc groups aren't blatantly obvious at times; we all know the groups of people that "magically" appear one after another and join up. However, with as many people as Rolf's made enemies with via his mass killing, I highly doubt that it would take much for 2 or 3 people that he's killed individually to think "Hmm, he whooped my ass pretty cleanly the last 3 times, and I can't get an edge. What, groupmate? You say he's whooped your ass too? Well by golly, maybe we can take him down together!"
Marsd's suggestion was "get more Knights on together," and "who said you had to go 1v1 against another cabal." He didn't say "get your buddies to ooc log on together at the same time." Under the right circumstances, most of the cabals CAN go 2- or 3-on-1 to accomplish their goals, and it's watched carefully. However, if your assumption that "more than one Knight logged on at a time HAS to be ooc," then you need to make a formal complaint if you suspect it. If there is a problem then let us know so it can be addressed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Kelek
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 12:00 am Post subject: Re: bleh |
|
|
| Jermayn wrote: |
| well, tack on two or three of my deaths to pure frustration against Rolf, I have the hardest time trying to figure out how to beat him...hell, it's forced me to take a short hiatus so I can enjoy the game again, and not /rage delete. When you're always losing, it's hard not to get discouraged. |
If it makes you feel better I can't even beat him, and I'm performing some outstanding running... I heard rumors that he was actually impressed with it. I still can't get him, I'm always on the run cause I don't do enough damage to be a real threat... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 12:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Ranger's should PWN shamans and mages. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Davairus
Implementor
Joined: 16 Jan 2004
Posts: 10351
Location: 0x0000
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 2:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
To fight a shaman you need to have a lot of preps...
purple potions
protection potions (because of enhanced damage/frenzy)
detect potions (because of mass invis)
gyvel potions (because of blindness)
curing items (because of cures)
If you are trying to fight a shaman without all that, and you are not a healer/paladin, you are doing something wrong. Oh yeah, and keep in mind the shamans just going to spam word til you run out of stuff, so find a rhythm that allows you to keep replenishing it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Simpleton
Joined: 22 Jan 2004
Posts: 150
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 09, 2005 4:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: |
| Ranger's should PWN shamans and mages. |
With what? Bows and shots suck against shield block, which a shaman will use always. Double disarm, a shaman will use weapon ward. A ranger could PWN a shaman back in the day when he could actually call his pets, now the shaman pwns the ranger, end of story. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ 
Search 
Memberlist 
Usergroups
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in 
