Playerkilling Statistics for Jan 2008

The Reaper · Joined: 24 Jul 2005 Posts: 3826

[KNIGHT]

Sanary: kills 11, deaths 4
Peridoc: kills 2, deaths 0
Olyn: kills 1, deaths 5
Elile: kills 0, deaths 1
Gathaldriel: kills 0, deaths 3
TOTAL: kills 14, deaths 13 (efficiency 51%)

[LEGION]

Rulo: kills 4, deaths 0
Razael: kills 0, deaths 2
Thoram: kills 0, deaths 2
TOTAL: kills 4, deaths 4 (efficiency 50%)

[JUSTICE]

Baphomet: kills 6, deaths 24
Mizphixil: kills 1, deaths 1
Pinnalia: kills 1, deaths 2
Bunabena: kills 0, deaths 1
Darlina: kills 0, deaths 1
Chauth: kills 0, deaths 1
TOTAL: kills 8, deaths 30 (efficiency 21%)

[KEEPER]

Yurneepo: kills 0, deaths 6
Farist: kills 0, deaths 6

[UNCABALLED] (level 50 kills only)

Gorgite: kills 5, deaths 11
Worzle: kills 2, deaths 1
Vornasrik: kills 1, deaths 5
Lerowyn: kills 1, deaths 0
Theoric: kills 1, deaths 3
Carra: kills 0, deaths 1
Raden: kills 0, deaths 4
Ejewan: kills 0, deaths 5
Dryzstan: kills 0, deaths 1
Tikgnotron: kills 0, deaths 3

[WORST MATCHUPS]

Sanary vs Gorgite 8- 2
Farist vs Baphomet 4- 0
Peridoc vs Telis 3- 0
Yurneepo vs Zlaad 3- 0
Gorgite vs Olyn 3- 0

[MOST LETHAL] (level 50 kills only)

Sanary: kills 11, deaths 4
Gorgite: kills 5, deaths 11
Worzle: kills 2, deaths 1
Peridoc: kills 2, deaths 0
Vornasrik: kills 1, deaths 5

[MOST ABUSED]

Baphomet: kills 6, deaths 24
Talmond: kills 0, deaths 23
Lorethel: kills 2, deaths 23
Delicia: kills 0, deaths 16
Changerang: kills 0, deaths 12

72 pkers have scored a bodycount of 276.

bassball · Guest

Wholesale Johnson · Joined: 25 Jan 2007 Posts: 142

From the ratings online:

3. Yurneepo the Shield of the Forest - 8 hours 39 minutes
6. Farist the Lieutenant of Strategy - 15 hours 44 minutes
Yurneepo: kills 0, deaths 6
Farist: kills 0, deaths 6

Kind of funny, I know there are other factors involved, but still...

Mahkan · Joined: 22 Oct 2007 Posts: 264 Location: The Interwebs

that just means they didnt kill any pinnacled characters

Slade · Emissary Joined: 17 Mar 2004 Posts: 666

_Clifton_ · Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 2:41 am Post subject:

it's probably from multikilling at 40

Davairus · Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:47 am Post subject:

It could be cheese multikilling, or it could just as easily be just pk'ing excessively.. that isn't deducable from those "worst matchup" stats. They were just inducted so they have been sitting at 40 a while racking kills up. I doubt that it is the result of multikills in a short period for both of those guys.

Mandor · Joined: 03 Mar 2006 Posts: 794

I recall you saying something about being able to rack up 100+ kills while you ranked without incurring penalties as long as you stayed away from multikills. have the penalties changed recently?

Davairus · Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 5:55 am Post subject:

Nope. Its true that you can game the system for a hot record (especially given current top pk stats.. only 58 pks takes #1 spot for the whole year?) ... but on the other hand, if you spilled over the limit and keep going, you sink a lot faster and damage quickly turns irreperable. So I wouldn't advise trying to do that without knowing what you were doing.

These monthly stats only count penalties incurred in the month, not the cumulative score, so that process really won't affect the results too much. Unless by some amazing luck, a guy manages to get one level along with two pks a day, he's going to be penalized. Man. One pk a day is a lot. So dont worry about lowbies. IF they could easily abuse it they would be doing so.

trance_monkey · Joined: 16 Nov 2005 Posts: 198

Mandor, when that was stated it was in the context that each rank beginning at 36 had a secret allotment of PKs you could achieve before going over.

So like, if you're allotted like 1 PK at 36, and kill three people during that rank, you could possibly already be at -3 (+1, -2, -2). Hence the irreparable damage Dav's talking about.

That's just a crude guess, no one's ever released what the PK limit for each rank really is since this system went in. I don't think so, anyway. It's not hard to deduce, though.

Davairus · Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 7:36 pm Post subject:

It'd probably be more like this

+1 +1 +1 +0 (first penalty doesnt hurt) -1 -2 -3 -6 -12 etc

Mandor · Joined: 03 Mar 2006 Posts: 794

http://abandonedrealms.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=2171

Davairus · Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:14 pm Post subject:

You have to spread them out while levelling, you dont sit at one rank pking over and over. See previous post for how that pwns a pk record.

jaran · Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 9:22 pm Post subject:

Just get to 50 and pk all you want Very Happy

_Clifton_ · Posted: Fri Feb 08, 2008 10:19 pm Post subject:

Oooh.... do pk records just go to 0.. or at you at like -12 and rebuild from there?

If it's the former, then that's gonna suck for these keeper apps.

Slade · Emissary Joined: 17 Mar 2004 Posts: 666

You shouldn't really be able to fall below 0 though..

Even the worst niche pk'er should be able to redeem himself if he leveled and went on to success higher up, especially 50. (And at the same time he still keeps his deaths from the niche period so its still bad).

Davairus · Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 6:57 am Post subject:

Redeeming yourself on AR = go delete and start over

	Abandoned Realms Forum Index -> PK stats	All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1